FOR  REVIEWERS
REVIEW GUIDELINES

» Review deadline:   May 15, 2006     Review website:   link

The goal of the guidelines included next is to aid the review process by providing a set of compact, consistent, and clear rules regarding the content and format requirements of the submitted papers. We ask that the reviewers:

1) verify that each paper under review contains the sections and information listed under "Content requirements" in the instructions "For authors":

• Any paper that does not meet these requirements should be rejected, regardless of the topic discussed. Please mention the missing section and/or missing information in the comments to the technical chairs that are part of the review form.

2)  be very critical in evaluating the papers: 

• DO accept papers only if they  are good and very good in terms of the method proposed, originality, organization, soundness of the experimental evaluations, clarity of the presentation  and language

• DO accept papers only if they are either original or, are non-original but have a different point of view on existing work 

• DO accept papers only if they have thorough experimental evaluations

• DO accept papers only if they contain comparisons of the experimental results with at least one of the state-of-art methods

• DO accept papers only if they DO NOT require major re-work in terms of the presentation and language