M
| The MMSP’06 survey consisted of 4 questions and received 51 responses (out of the 150 participants). The following percentages of participants who answered the survey wish that keynotes/overviews/panels/demos be included in the next workshop edition: |
|
Keynote lectures
100
% (51 out of 51) Overview lectures
96
% (49
out of 51) Panels 76.47
% (39
out of 51) Demos 86.27 % (44 out of
51)
|
Comments and suggestions:
|
|
|
I enjoyed MMSP’06 greatly and
would like to thank the organizers for doing such a good job end-to-end. --Chou Wu |
|
|
| The keynote and overview talks
were excellent at MMSP 2006 and were more interesting/informative than the
standard oral sessions. --Colin Doutre |
|
|
|
Although there is great value in
the oral and poster presentations, I strongly believe that the keynote and
invited lectures are the highlights of technical meetings like MMSP and should
be a regular feature at these meetings. I personally learned a great deal
from each of the keynotes and invited lectures and I believe each of the
speakers did an excellent job in providing sufficient detail and broad
perspective on each topic. Keep up these keynotes and invited lectures. --Larry Rabiner |
|
|
|
The workshop was very good. It
was small enough to allow attendees to focus on almost everything that was
going on, but big enough that there was good representation from different
areas within our domain. The keynotes were outstanding, and the overviews were
extremely useful, especially for attendees with little exposure to certain
sub-specialties to be able to understand the current state-of-the-art of those
particular areas before listening to the full oral presentations in that area.
Something I would like to see in the future would be for the slides of the keynotes
and the overviews to be included in the CD, and not just the proceedings. Would
it be possible to make those available for attendees to last week’s edition? I
look forward to next year’s workshop. --Martinez Alfonso |
|
|
|
Thank you for your efforts. You did a great job of lining up really
interesting keynote/overview lectures, as well as having an interesting mix of
papers. It would be nice if a check box could be added to the paper submission
form, so that the submitting author could indicate whether they would rather
have an oral or poster session (and possibly how strong this preference
is). Some topics do not lend themselves
to posters (highly mathematical developments) and some do not lend themselves
to oral presentation (when there is an associated demo or when the author is
hoping for more feedback from the audience. It would also be nice if the poster
sessions had more support for laptop-based video or demos (power strips,
tables, wired drops). This might make
it so that there is not a need for an explicit "demo session". --Michele Covell |
|
|
|
The workshop was very well
organized. --Pietro Zanuttigh |
|
|
|
I found 6 overview sessions a
bit too much. Maybe one per day is fine. One keynote might also be fine. I have
found the 2 panels interesting. Interaction with the audience should be
emphasized. Maybe the panel can start with some selected demos to trigger the
interaction with the audience and to trigger a discussion about future research
directions. I have no clear picture how a demo or hands-on session would look
like, but the impact of such a session should be explored and tested. --Markus Flierl |
|
|
|
--Claudio Weidmann |
|
|
|
I suggest having not more than
one panel. I suggest having a more focused list of topics for discussion. Also
I propose that the panel discussion have a topic that is fixed well before the
event to allow a good preparation of all panelists and the audience as well. --Wolfgang Theimer |
|
|
I found the MMSP a very nice and
interesting workshop. But poster session should not be in parallel to oral sessions. --Markus Friebe |
|
|
|
I would maintain the actual
poster sessions (posters for one day). --Federico Matta |
|
|
|
I think that an approach like
ICIP, where posters are not seen as a consolation prize, would be an
improvement. This would enable both poster and oral sessions to be made more
coherent. I would also like to see more discussion, perhaps in parallel
sessions. This would enable small communities with a common interest to have
very detailed discussions. --Michael Frater |
|
|
|
For the poster session, I'd like
the session chair to briefly introduce every poster, e.g. make a brief
walk-around. --Igor Fischer |
|
|
|
It will be good if materials
like PPT are included in proceeding CD. --Sh Kim |
|
|
|
I wonder more meals should be
included in the workshop. It would give participants more time to talk to one
another. --Sumit Ro |
|
|