We analyze a natural class of models built upon active lines of work in political opinion formation, cultural diversity, and language evolution, due to Axelrod (1997), Deffuant et al. (2000) and Abrams and Strogatz (2003). Our basic model posits an arbitrary graph structure describing which "types" of people can influence one another (i.e., people are only influenced by sufficiently similar interaction partners). We achieve a complete characterization of (stable) equilibria and prove convergence from all starting states. We also obtain partial results for a more general model with a second graph structure describing which types of people can interact with one another.
We begin to address this problem formally. We assume that each category (e.g., geography, profession, hobbies) is characterized by a latent metric capturing (dis)similarities in this category, and gives rise to a separate social network: a random graph parametrized by this metric. The algorithm only observes the unlabeled union of these graphs, and reconstructs each metric with provably low distortion.