Classes, Jim, but not as we know them (2009)

This is my invited talk for ECOOP 2009, July 2009. There's no paper I'm afraid.


Haskell is now quite widely used, but its most important contributions are the ideas that it embodies. In this talk I will focus on one of these ideas, namely type classes, with a few anecdotes and reflections along the way about the process of developing the language.

Type classes are probably Haskell's most distinctive feature. The original idea is very neat and, better still, it led to a long series of subsequent generalisations and innovations. Indeed, although the language is now nineteen years old, Haskell's type system is still in a state of furious development. For example, I am involved in adding type-level functions to Haskell, as I will briefly describe.

I will explain what type classes are, how they differ from the classes of mainstream object oriented languages, why I think they are so cool, and what the hot topics are. I'll give plenty of examples, so you don't need to already know Haskell.

Haskell and Erlang: growing up together (2009)

My invited talk from the Erlang Factory meeting, in June 2009. No paper. Abstract
Haskell and Erlang were both born around 1990, with a common commitment to functional programmin. Although they have very different genealogies, and subsequent evolution paths, they are both gaining increasing mind-share as 2010 approaches. In my talk I'll contrast the two languages, paying particular attention to (a) types and (b) concurrency.

Wearing the hair shirt: a retrospective on Haskell (2003)

Simon Peyton Jones, invited talk at POPL 2003. (There is no paper in the published proceedings.)

Powerpoint slides:

Thanks to Ralf Hinze for the PDF-ised versions.


Haskell was 15 years old at the POPL'03 meeting, when I presented this talk: it was born at a meeting at the 1987 conference on Functional Programming and Computer Architecture (FPCA'87).

In this talk, which is very much a personal view, I take a look back at the language, and try to tease out what we have learned from the experience of designing and implementing it. The main areas I discuss are: syntax (briefly), laziness (the hair shirt of the title), type classes, and sexy types.

On the way, I try to identify a few open questions that I think merit further study.