Information
Science and Technology Study Group
DARPA
National
Academy of Sciences
August
15-16, 2001
8:00-8:30
Continental Breakfast
8:30-9:00
Meeting Overview and Goals
Eric Horvitz
9:00-11:45
Surveying the Terrain: Results, Challenges, and Opportunities
I
George Sperling
Tom Landauer
Baruch Fischhoff
11:45-1:30
Working lunch following a 15 minute
break
12:00-12:45 Computational Advances
and Augmented Cognition: Developments in User Modeling, Sensing, Inference, and
Machine Learning
Eric Horvitz
12:45-1:15 In the Real
World: Challenges of High-Stakes, Time-Critical Analysis, Communication, and
Decision Making in Defense
Keith Holcomb
Break
(15 minutes)
Steve Ellis
Sharon Oviatt
John Carroll
Chip Levy
3:00-3:15
Breakout Groups: Overview and Goals
Eric Horvitz and Misha Pavel
3:15
Stroll to State Plaza Hotel for Breakout
Meetings
3:30-6:00
Breakout Group Meetings (see suggested breakout
groups)
6:00 –
6:45
Social hour (Envoy room, State Plaza Hotel)
6:45 –
8:15
Buffet Dinner (Diplomat room, State Plaza
Hotel)
8:00-8:30
Continental Breakfast (Diplomat room, State Plaza
Hotel)
8:30-11:30
Breakout groups continue at State Plaza
Hotel
11:30
Return to National Academy of Sciences (Room
150)
11:45
-1:00
Lunch at the National Academy of Sciences
1:00-3:00
Breakout group briefs (20 minutes each)
Dylan Schmorrow
Conclusion and Wrap-up
Eric
Horvitz and Misha Pavel
John Miyamoto, Chair
Baruch Fischhoff
Eric Horvitz
Misha
Pavel
Keith Holcomb
Mary Czerwinski, Chair
Steve
Ellis
Barbara Tversky
David Chin
Martha Crosby
Al Ahumada
Denny Proffitt, Chair
Geoff
Loftus
Robert Bjork
Lee Kollmorgan
Dylan Schmorrow
Eric Horvitz, Chair
Wayne
Gray
George
Sperling
Chip
Levy
Eileen
Kowler
Bob
Steinman
Tom Landauer, Chair
Sharon Oviatt
Ryan Nickerson
Charles Wayne
Allen
Sears
John Carroll, Chair
Larry Maloney
Deborah Boehm-Davis
Bill
Mark
Breakout group discussion
During your breakout group meetings, please consider the following questions in your discussions and presentations: · Regarding the potential for "augmenting cognition,” what are key relevant theories, models, or empirical results on human limitations or biases in this area? Are the results well characterized, credible, quantitative?
· What are some key opportunities for harnessing computer-based methods, components, and procedures, for bolstering cognition in light of biases and/or limitations?
· What are some concerns or challenges with regard to the adequacy of knowledge about the relevant psychology and information processing. What additional basic psychological and theoretical work is required? What kind of applied testing or HCI experiments are required? What studies would be most valuable?
· What are some potential challenges with regard to the required computational methods, prowess to support the different forms of augmentation you have discussed?
· Take an optimistic perspective: In a great outcome, what potential approaches to augmenting people's abilities might be developed? What kind of efficiencies might be gained if this was done well?
· Take a pessimistic perspective: What are some caveats about attempting to augment cognition in this arena? What dangers regarding efforts in this area should we be most sensitive to?
· What kind of metrics would you suggest for evaluating the success of augmented cognition efforts?