20 April 2009
The failure of users to follow security advice has often been noted. They chose weak passwords, ignore secu- rity warnings, and are oblivious to certificates. It is often suggested that users are hopelessly lazy and un- motivated on security questions. We argue that users' rejection of the security advice they receive is entirely rational from an economic perspective. As with many activities, online crime generates direct losses and ex- ternalities. The advice offers to shield them from the direct costs of attacks, but burdens them with the in- direct costs, or externalities. Since the direct costs are generally small relative to the indirect ones, they reject this bargain. We examine three areas of user educa- tion: password rules, phishing site identification, and SSL certificates. In each we find that the advice is com- plex and growing, but the benefit is largely speculative or moot. In the cases where we can estimate benefit, it emerges that the burden of following the security advice is actually greater than the direct losses caused by the attack.
|Publisher||Association for Computing Machinery, Inc.|
Copyright © 2007 by the Association for Computing Machinery, Inc. Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, to republish, to post on servers, or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from Publications Dept, ACM Inc., fax +1 (212) 869-0481, or firstname.lastname@example.org. The definitive version of this paper can be found at ACM’s Digital Library --http://www.acm.org/dl/.