Transaction Timestamping in (Temporal) Databases

Many database applications need accountability

and trace-ability that necessitate retaining previous

database states. For a transaction-time database supporting

this, the choice of times used to timestamp

database records, to establish when records are or were

current, needs to be consistent with a committed transaction

serialization order. Previous solutions have chosen

timestamps at commit time, selecting a time that

agrees with commit order. However, SQL standard

databases can require an earlier choice because a statement

within a transaction may request “current time.”

Managing timestamps chosen before a serialization order

is established is the challenging problem we solve

here.

By building on two-phase locking concurrency control,

we can delay a transaction’s choice of a timestamp,

reducing the chance that transactions may need

to be aborted in order keep timestamps consistent with

a serialization order. Also, while timestamps stored

with records in a transaction-time database make it

possible to directly identify write-write and write-read

conflicts, handling read-write conflicts requires more.

Our simple auxiliary structure conservatively detects

read-write conflicts, and hence provides transaction

timestamps that are consistent with a serialization order.

temporaltime.pdf
PDF file

In  VLDB Proceedings

Publisher  Very Large Data Bases Endowment Inc.
All articles published in this journal are protected by copyright, which covers the exclusive rights to reproduce and distribute the article (e.g., as offprints), as well as all translation rights. No material published in this journal may be reproduced photographically or stored on microfilm, in electronic data bases, video disks, etc., without first obtaining written permission from Very Large Data Bases Endowment Inc.

Details

TypeInproceedings
> Publications > Transaction Timestamping in (Temporal) Databases