David Lomet, Roger Barga, Mohamed Mokbel, German Shegalov, Rui Wang, and Yunyue Zhu
April 2006
Transaction time databases retain and provide access
to prior states of a database. An update “inserts” a new
record while preserving the old version. Immortal DB
builds transaction time database support into a database
engine, not in middleware. It supports as of queries returning
records current at the specified time. It also supports
snapshot isolation concurrency control. Versions are
stamped with the “clock times” of their updating transactions.
The timestamp order agrees with transaction serialization
order. Lazy timestamping propagates timestamps
to transaction updates after commit. Versions are kept in
an integrated storage structure, with historical versions initially
stored with current data. Time-splits of pages permit
large histories to be maintained, and enable time based indexing,
which is essential for high performance historical
queries. Experiments show that Immortal DB introduces
little overhead for accessing recent database states while
providing access to past states.
![]() PDF file |
In: ICDE
Publisher: IEEE Computer Society
Copyright © 2007 IEEE. Reprinted from IEEE Computer Society.
This material is posted here with permission of the IEEE. Internal or personal use of this material is permitted. However, permission to reprint/republish this material for advertising or promotional purposes or for creating new collective works for resale or redistribution must be obtained from the IEEE by writing to pubs-permissions@ieee.org.
By choosing to view this document, you agree to all provisions of the copyright laws protecting it.
| Type: | Inproceedings |