Congestion games with malicious players

Moshe Babaioff, Robert Kleinberg, and Christos H. Papadimitriou

Abstract

We study the equilibria of non-atomic congestion games in which there are two types of players: rational players, who seek to minimize their own delay, and malicious players, who seek to maximize the average delay experienced by the rational players. We study the existence of pure and mixed Nash equilibria for these games, and we seek to quantify the impact of the malicious players on the equilibrium. One counterintuitive phenomenon which we demonstrate is the “windfall of malice”: paradoxically, when a myopically malicious player gains control of a fraction of the flow, the new equilibrium may be more favorable for the remaining rational players than the previous equilibrium.

Details

Publication typeInproceedings
Published inACM Conference on Electronic Commerce (EC'07)
URLhttp://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1250910.1250926
Pages103-112
> Publications > Congestion games with malicious players