In this paper we show that generative models are competitive with and sometimes superior to discriminative models, when both kinds of models are allowed to learn structures that are optimal for discrimination. In particular, we compare Bayesian Networks and Conditional loglinear models on two NLP tasks. We observe that when the structure of the generative model encodes very strong independence assumptions (a la Naive Bayes), a discriminative model is superior, but when the generative model is allowed to weaken these independence assumptions via learning a more complex structure, it can achieve very similar or better performance than a corresponding discriminative model. In addition, as structure learning for generative models is far more efficient, they may be preferable for some tasks.
|Published in||In Proceedings of EMNLP|
|Publisher||Association for Computational Linguistics|
All copyrights reserved by ACL 2007