Tim Harris
August 2003
This report discusses two design choices which arose in our recent work on introducing a new `atomic' keyword as an extension to the Java programming language. We discuss the extent to which programs using atomic blocks should be provided with an explicit `abort' operation to roll-back the effects of the current block. We also discuss mechanisms for supporting blocks that perform I/O operations or external database transactions.
![]() PDF file |
| Type | TechReport |
| Number | UCAM-CL-TR-572 |
| Institution | University of Cambridge, Computer Laboratory |