Share on Facebook Tweet on Twitter Share on LinkedIn Share by email
From Writing and Analysis to the Repository: Taking the Scholars' Perspective on Scholarly Archiving

Catherine C. Marshall

Abstract

This paper reports the results of a qualitative field study of the scholarly writing, collaboration, information management, and long-term archiving practices of researchers in five related subdisciplines. The study focuses on the kinds of artifacts the researchers create in the process of writing a paper, how they exchange and store materials over the short term, how they handle references and bibliographic resources, and the strategies they use to guarantee the long term safety of their scholarly materials. The findings reveal: (1) the adoption of a new CIM infrastructure relies crucially on whether it compares favorably to email along six critical dimensions; (2) personal scholarly archives should be maintained as a side-effect of collaboration and the role of ancillary material such as datasets remains to be worked out; and (3) it is vital to consider agency when we talk about depositing new types of scholarly materials into disciplinary repositories.

Details

Publication typeInproceedings
Published inProceedings of the 8th ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (JCDL 2008)
Pages251-260
PublisherAssociation for Computing Machinery, Inc.
> Publications > From Writing and Analysis to the Repository: Taking the Scholars' Perspective on Scholarly Archiving