Share on Facebook Tweet on Twitter Share on LinkedIn Share by email
Characterizing Truthful Multi-armed Bandit Mechanisms

Moshe Babaioff, Yogeshwer Sharma, and Aleksandrs Slivkins

Abstract

We consider a multiround auction setting motivated by pay-per-click auctions for Internet advertising. In each round the auctioneer selects an advertiser and shows her ad, which is then either clicked or not. An advertiser derives value from clicks; the value of a click is her private information. Initially, neither the auctioneer nor the advertisers have any information about the likelihood of clicks on the advertisements. The auctioneer's goal is to design a (dominant strategies) truthful mechanism that (approximately) maximizes the social welfare. If the advertisers bid their true private values, our problem is equivalent to the multi-armed bandit problem, and thus can be viewed as a strategic version of the latter. In particular, for both problems the quality of an algorithm can be characterized by regret, the difference in social welfare between the algorithm and the benchmark which always selects the same “best” advertisement. We investigate how the design of multi-armed bandit algorithms is affected by the restriction that the resulting mechanism must be truthful. We find that deterministic truthful mechanisms have certain strong structural properties---essentially, they must separate exploration from exploitation---and they incur much higher regret than the optimal multi-armed bandit algorithms. Moreover, we provide a truthful mechanism which (essentially) matches our lower bound on regret.

Details

Publication typeArticle
Published inSIAM Journal on Computing (SICOMP)
URLhttp://epubs.siam.org/doi/abs/10.1137/120878768
Pages194-230
Volume43
Number1

Previous versions

Moshe Babaioff, Yogeshwer Sharma, and Aleksandrs Slivkins. Characterizing Truthful Multi-Armed Bandit Mechanisms, Association for Computing Machinery, Inc., July 2009.

> Publications > Characterizing Truthful Multi-armed Bandit Mechanisms