Share on Facebook Tweet on Twitter Share on LinkedIn Share by email
A Field Study of Refactoring Challenges and Benefits

Miryung Kim, Thomas Zimmermann, and Nachiappan Nagappan


It is widely believed that refactoring improves software quality and developer productivity. However, few empirical studies quantitatively assess refactoring benefits or investigate developers' perception towards these benefits. This paper presents a field study of refactoring benefits and challenges at Microsoft through three complementary study methods: a survey, semi-structured interviews with professional software engineers, and quantitative analysis of version history data. Our survey finds that the refactoring definition in practice is not confined to a rigorous definition of semantics-preserving code transformations and that developers perceive that refactoring involves substantial cost and risks. We also report on interviews with a designated refactoring team, which has led a multi-year, centralized effort on refactoring Windows. The quantitative analysis of Windows 7 version history finds that the binary modules refactored by this team experienced significant reduction in the number of inter-module dependencies and post-release defects, indicating a visible benefit of refactoring.


Publication typeInproceedings
Published inProceedings of the 20th International Symposium on Foundations of Software Engineering (FSE 2012)
PublisherAssociation for Computing Machinery, Inc.

Newer versions

Miryung Kim, Thomas Zimmermann, and Nachiappan Nagappan. An Empirical Study of Refactoring Challenges and Benefits at Microsoft, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, IEEE – Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, July 2014.

> Publications > A Field Study of Refactoring Challenges and Benefits