Kissling, D W., Dormann, C., Groeneveld, J., Hickler, T., Kühn, I.1, McInerny, G J., Montoya, J M., Römermann, C., Schiffers, K., Schurr, F M., Singer, A., Svenning, J C., Zimmermann, N E., O’Hara, and B.
2012
Aim: Biotic interactions – within guilds or across trophic levels – have widely
been ignored in species distribution models (SDMs). This synthesis outlines the
development of ‘species interaction distribution models’ (SIDMs), which aim to
incorporate multispecies interactions at large spatial extents using interaction
matrices.
Location: Local to global.
Methods: We review recent approaches for extending classical SDMs to
incorporate biotic interactions, and identify some methodological and
conceptual limitations. To illustrate possible directions for conceptual
advancement we explore three principal ways of modelling multispecies
interactions using interaction matrices: simple qualitative linkages between
species, quantitative interaction coefficients reflecting interaction strengths, and
interactions mediated by interaction currencies. We explain methodological
advancements for static interaction data and multispecies time series, and outline
methods to reduce complexity when modelling multispecies interactions.
Results: Classical SDMs ignore biotic interactions and recent SDM extensions
only include the unidirectional influence of one or a few species. However, novel
methods using error matrices in multivariate regression models allow interactions
between multiple species to be modelled explicitly with spatial co-occurrence
data. If time series are available, multivariate versions of population dynamic
models can be applied that account for the effects and relative importance of
species interactions and environmental drivers. These methods need to be
extended by incorporating the non-stationarity in interaction coefficients across
space and time, and are challenged by the limited empirical knowledge on spatiotemporal
variation in the existence and strength of species interactions. Model
complexity may be reduced by: (1) using prior ecological knowledge to set a
subset of interaction coefficients to zero, (2) modelling guilds and functional
groups rather than individual species, and (3) modelling interaction currencies
and species’ effect and response traits.
Main conclusions: There is great potential for developing novel approaches that
incorporate multispecies interactions into the projection of species distributions
and community structure at large spatial extents. Progress can be made by: (1)
developing statistical models with interaction matrices for multispecies cooccurrence
datasets across large-scale environmental gradients, (2) testing the
potential and limitations of methods for complexity reduction, and (3) sampling
and monitoring comprehensive spatio-temporal data on biotic interactions in
multispecies communities.
In Journal of Biogeography
| Type | Article |