Share on Facebook Tweet on Twitter Share on LinkedIn Share by email
Local vs Global Models for Effort Estimation and Defect Prediction

Tim Menzies, Andrew Butcher, Andrian Marcus, and Thomas Zimmermann

Abstract

Data miners can infer rules showing how to improve either (a) the effort estimates of a project or (b) the defect predictions of a software module. Such studies often exhibit conclusion instability regarding what is the most effective action for different projects or modules.

This instability can be explained by data heterogeneity. We show that effort and defect data contain many local regions with markedly different properties to the global space. In other words, what appears to be useful in a global context is often irrelevant for particular local contexts.

This result raises questions about the generality of conclusions from empirical SE. At the very least, SE researchers should test if their supposedly general conclusions are valid within subsets of their data. At the very most, empirical SE should become a search for local regions with similar properties (and conclusions should be constrained to just those regions).

Details

Publication typeInproceedings
Published inProceedings of the 26st IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE 2011)
PublisherIEEE
> Publications > Local vs Global Models for Effort Estimation and Defect Prediction